No Guns for Negroes
 

JPFO.org
January 19, 2010

No Guns for Negroes exposes the racist history behind American gun control laws.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Stacks you trying to start trouble? :36_1_30:

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

If JPFO wants to be taken seriously, they should make an all out effort to point out that the majority of the WORST gun control politicians are members of their tribe:
Schumer, Waxman, Feinstein, Boxer, Lautenberg, Metzenbaum and Cellar.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

They're well aware of that fact. Here's a quote from one article on the JPFO website:
Some of the other articles on their website under Jews and Gun Control :
Jews and Guns
Jews and "Gun Control":
Fear of Freedom or Freedom from Fear?

Maybe you're already aware of these articles and their acknowledgment of the role Jewish political "leaders" play in gun control, and you just think they need to do more to make this known. Fair enough. Perhaps they should have a dedicated campaign to publicize this added to the half dozen or so campaigns they already have going, but I still see them as a force for good in defending our rights.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

For some reason this thread made me think of this clip from Ride With The Devil:

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

I realize they have covered themselves by saying what needs to be said as quietly as possible to as few people as possible. In reality, less than 25% of their members are aware of the Jewish role in gun control and they like it that way.

They are phony.

Their Job is to say loud and clear "We are Jews and we love guns! We hate gun control!" to distract the goyim from what is happening.

Schumer, Feinstein etc are not saying loud and clear "We are Jews and we want to disarm the goyim!" but their actions speak louder than their lack of words.

The proof is not the message but how the message gets across....and they know this art.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

say what you want about them

But I love rubbing in the fact that the NRA is americas oldest civil rights group (1871)

pisses liberals off.....

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

I enjoyed listening to a different perspective. More guns in the hands of respectable US citizens = less crime. period.

Also, moved thread to Firearms section where it belongs.

:wink:

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Made me think of this >> Elitism trumps Equality.

I have guns : you don't

I have money : you don't

I have power : you don't

I AM TPTB : you are not, now bow down !

:adore:

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

There is a proposal to open a shooting range in a high crime black neighborhood near where I live, and the �neighborhood leaders� are all vehemently opposed.

They think the presence of a shooting range/gun store will somehow cause an increase in crime and violence.

Funny, but the nearly all white suburb where I shoot and purchase supplies is almost entirely free of violent crime.

But you know, for once, I�m sympathetic to the anti-gun �neighborhood leaders.�

I think that In the absence of a sweeping and comprehensive black cultural counter-revolution, encouraging gun ownership among lower class blacks is a very. . . risky idea.

And before anybody freaks-- I also think the same applies to lower class whites. And Hispanics.

In strict economic terms, I may very well be the world�s poorest elitist.

Seriously, without drastic political, cultural, and spiritual change, will more guns make things better?

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Well, ya know - guns sometimes jump off the table and shoot by themselves ! Just being in the mere presence of a firearm is unhealthy. :sarc:

How about it's risky to let unstable violent males with too much testosterone and a propensity for societal outlash own weapons of any kind ???

Seriously, I think there's a flaw in your thinking.

~AD~

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Heard Aaron on A.J.'s show yesterday, claimed that these anti-gun jewish leaders are not jewish. Same old tired arguement that they are all Molech whoreshipping satanists hideing behind other religions that AJ uses. Gee, right out of 2 KINGS 23. If I hadn't grown up less than a half mile from where one of their shrines sat in a ravine on private property behind the "candy store" of a cub scout camp, I would have smercked at such sillyness in these modern days.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

The constitution does not impose a duty on state and local governments to protect the citizens from criminal harm"

Deshaney vs.Winnebago County, 1989

U.S. Supreme Court

Min 5.41


Remeber this factiod the next time a Gungrabber wants to quote figures and such.


T

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Did you notice the blatant lie about fighting "disproportionately" in the wars? Now that's funny.....

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Quadroon, I can really see where you are coming from. The only thing is I don't believe it is entirely economic based as you implied by 'ownership among lower class'. I really think it has to do with maturity, intelligence and responsibility. Anyone who lacks these traits, regardless if they are lower class or upper class, I don't want to be around if they have a firearm. By the same token, I cannot agree with denying anyone the right to a firearm. If a person is free and lives amongst others in society - they should have the right. I believe this is true for those who have served prison terms as well. If they are free and have been placed amongst us - then they should have the capacity to own a firearm, otherwise they should have not been set free. If we believe some individuals cannot be trusted with ownership of a firearm, then perhaps they should not be trusted to be among others in society to begin with. If they want to do harm to others, they will do so regardless of the law.

Maybe I am too old school, but I put the blame almost entirely on our justice system. Before our justice system went corporate, citizens were actively involved with their collective well being. Justice was served for the victim, instead of for the benefit of the state. There was a time when towns had a single sheriff who would call upon the citizenry to enforce the law. When their was a murder or violent crime, the citizens were actively involved instead of passively allowing the 'legal system' to handle it. Frontier justice was quick and merciless - providing an extreme deterrent to those who would do harm to an innocent citizen. If we had handled justice, back then, as we do today - most parts of this country would be run by criminals (oh wait, it happened anyway!).

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

I`m a rabid Russian patriot but IMHO Russia is not ready for carrying permits. Only the elite and the security can carry there and I agree with the laws. I`ve gotten into fights in Russia since I was 5, had a knife stuck to my throat at 7 and I went to one the top, most elite HS in the country.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Another Gun vid that confirms Dodds daddy did the dirty deed.


Minute 2:27

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

It would appear that anyone who supports that traitorous 5th column organization known as the NRA is suffering from a rectal-cranial inversion. The NRA provides cover for the gungrabbers while taking money from gunowners and making them feel good about themselves. Some people are frighteningly naive. You can thank the NRA for NFA '34, GCA '68, the machinegun ban, and ESPECIALLY that biggest pile of steaming dung, NICS.

That's right - every time you have to fill out a yellow sheet and 'ask permission' of gov.org if you can have a gun, you can thank the NRA.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

The way to get society ready for carrying is to allow all to carry. Offer education in guns of course, but everyone carrying would sort peoples' manners real quick.

Imagine the effect on car jacking or armed robbery if it was an immediate and fatal execution.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

While I agree with certain aspects of the premise you're offering, there is another very real possibility to this.

If everyone was carrying, and everyone knew that everyone else was carrying, carjackers probably wouldn't just stick a pistol into the window and threaten to shoot. They would just shoot and kill the victim quickly, probably from the driver's 8:00 position. In other words, they would use the element of surprise, and kill the victim before the victim could realize what was happening. They'd also steal the victim's weapon and add it to their arsenal (gladly).

In the case of robberies, the same logic applies. If you know when you bust into a bank to rob it that everyone is carrying, you'll just ramp up your weaponry and tactics. You might even want to knock off a couple of people right away just to make your point to the rest of the customers and employees in the bank.

That's the way criminals think. That's the logical next step. Criminals are evil, and they plan in evil ways.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

I`m very old-fashioned and conservative. I want everyone carrying AND I WANT DUELS. People have been softened to the point of no return.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Oh horrors! You desire that society get back to the the importance of honor? You Neanderthal!

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Congressman John D. Dingell, in actually speaking before an NRA audience, told the assembled crowd, 'In times of great stress, it is permissible to walk side by side with the devil to get to the other side of the bridge.'


That is all you need to know.



T

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

The way to get society ready for carrying is to allow and encourage all to carry. Offer education in guns of course, but everyone carrying would sort peoples' manners real quick.

Imagine the effect on car jacking or armed robbery if it was an immediate and fatal execution.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

This is sig-worthy.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

We would find out quick who's "mouth is writing checks your body can't cash!" :favorites8:

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

All the tuff talk would dry up overnight if the person knew that talking smack could cost them their breath.

People would be pretty dam courteous of each other I think.


T

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

DUELS ARE THE FOUNDATION OF SOCIETY WORTH A DAMN or at least a culture of everyday street fighting like in Russia where we step outside every day to settle things like men. I once chickened out of a fight with TWO GUYS MUCH BIGGER THAN ME WHEN I WAS ABOUT 12 and my dad nearly beat me up for cowardice.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

There is a time to fight and there is a time to withdraw.

Cleary that was not the time to fight.

T

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

"An armed society is a polite society" Robert Heinlein

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

That "logic" is not the way it is in the real world. Most all criminals are punks and cowards at heart. When is the last time you heard of something like these instances or a mass murder happenning in Alaska where almost everybody is packing and loaded for bear? Doesn't happen, even in Anchorage which is close to 15% black. Makes for a very polite society!


Just think of what a calming effect it would have if we built free public shooting ranges open 24/7 in the heart of all the worst areas of the cities? Armed shooters coming and going from 50-75 miles around at all hours of the day and night to use the fancy free facility...............a criminal's worst nightmare.

The Black Panthers were the first modern militia; organised to try to rid the hoods of the wave of smack and crime brought in by TPTB in the 1960s from the Viet Nam Opium War

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Paradoxically your gun rights have softened you to the point of no return (I`m addressing all Americans here). Remember how martial arts started developing? A complete sword ban in Japan. Russians have been disarmed so we fight with bare hands since kindergarten AND face everyday risk of MEETING COLD STEEL ( kitchen and homemade knives). An armed society like USA AND WITHOUT DUELS ends up completely castrated because of living in nearly total safety behind your guns.

Guns are a two-edged sword.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Soldiers of the mind overcome soldiers of the body.

Though I do agree that fighting (for men at least), should almost be mandatory.
No man wants to be and no woman wants another pu$$Y......well most anyway.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Another sig-worthy line.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Read Clayton Cramer's The Racist Roots of Gun Control. ~15 years old, it's a good read.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

One good thing about duels is that excessively proud people would be eliminated from the gene pool.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

I disagree. The guy in the next car would kill 'em often enough. They would be massively outnumbered on the streets and in the banks if the good guys all carried.

They are only bold cause all they have to worry about is cops right now. Criminals aren't heros they are opportunists.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

My main sin is pride. Why do you want me dead?

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

I don't. I was just trolling because I don't think duels are such a good idea in a civilized society. There are too many hot headed idiots and people would have to become slaves to martial arts, spending thousands of hours training to become badasses instead of doing productive work.
People who have family and debts and must work 60 hours a week and live in the city would be at the mercy of unemployed thugs that spar all day.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Here I agree 100%. I did my karate when I was a teen
(paid big money to an ex-KGB officer coach who could do feats which make anything you see on TV tame, a real killer with blood on his hands but a hell of a gentleman, an extremely polite and smart guy who could make holes in people with his finger).Now I carry 2 knives and a Surefire light and I`m confident I could dispatch any nut who is not carrying a gun. There is zero time to train.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

What I got from the video were that two people and the gun range had one eye closed. They should learn to shoot with both open. This way they have a better peripheral view of their surroundings during a gun fight.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

I noticed the same thing. Not perfect gun handling during most of the video...


However, I found the premise very interesting. Should bring pause to any liberal / minority gun basher.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Did you all see this one from them?
http://www.jpfo.org/filegen-a-m/2a-today-download.htm

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Honor and noble stupidity are two different things.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

You are right,there is a very fine line between the 2 and sometimes even the smartest cannot see the difference,especially in the heat of a confrontation.

I know a Russian dude who spent 7 years in a US jail for selling a pistol to an undercover agent in NYC in the early 90`s. He said an unforgettable thing:
"it`s better to be a coward for 5 minutes than dead your entire life". The guy`s face is covered with knife scars and he knows what he is talking about.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

I agree with PART of your last sentence--I think the problem is morality/spirituality or rather the lack of it. I know plenty of poor people who aren't stealing, killing or destroying to get what they want. One's moral perspective is going to shape their actions no matter what their social, economic or political views are. Contrast that with these principles put forth by one of the "founding fathers" of today's neo-Marxist elite, Saul Alinsky:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_Radicals

I have many liberal friends who wouldn't even begin to entertain the kind of moral relativism (dare I say moral absence?) that Alinsky proposes: It's OK to do XYZ if the outcome is good for me, but not if the end result is bad for me. You might as well say that Stalin was a good leader because he was able to implement his policies successfully for 29 years, not that he was a monster whose actions killed 30 million people.

Flip side of the coin, just because someone is poor and liberal doesn't mean they won't act in a morally honorable manner.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

http://www.stalinsociety.org.uk/presentations.html

I`m sorry to inform you that you have been lied to about almost everything including Stalin.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

A little historical factoid. I have an old middle 50,s encyclopedia, in it they have a rather long dissertation of the south during reconstruction. After reading it i came to understand much of the cause for white attitudes towards blacks and why Jim Crow laws came about.

Towards the end they revealed that the northern government ordered their military commanders in the southern states to dissallow much of the white population in the south from voting, " in direct violation of the US Constitution ", and ordered them to also allow former black slaves the vote, " again, in direct violation of the US Constitution ". After blacks won sweeping political victories throughout the south, passage of the 14th Ammendment became assured, " after the white dominated southern states had refused its passage ".

Now, at this time things were really beginning to heat up, again, in the south. White folks were pissed! This is when the federal military crossed the line, " again, following orders from the government ", and began training and equiping black militias to use against southern whites. Bad move!

The governments of the northern states were so outraged by this, they began to demand the federal government cease its activities in the south and withdraw its southern commanders. The northern states told the federal government if they did not comply, they would withdraw their support. All northern states threatened that if the federal government started another war, they would not support them with some even going so far as to tell them, they would gladly aid the south!

The rest is history as most know it. The federal government brought reconstruction to an end, withdrew its southern commanders and let the south do as it would. As a direct result of these things, and more, the attitudes of whites towards blacks took a decidedly negative turn and Jim Crow became the mainstay for generations.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Remember when? On the side of all police cars was painted "To Protect and Serve"? When was the last time you saw that on the side of a police car?

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Riiiiiiiiight. And these people are astrophysicists:

http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djubl...rthsociety.htm

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

And who are you?

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

I'm a journalist. I cross-check information to confirm or refute facts. It can be objectively proven that the Earth isn't flat. And the graves of millions of dead Russians and others from the early to mid-20th Century are pretty damning evidence against Stalin regardless of how many sympathizers he has. But hey, Stalinism is still working well in North Korea, so why stop a good thing if it works??:sarc:

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

I`m Russian and I can`t wait until someone shows me the graves of those killed by Stalin. Could you do me this long-needed favor? Stalinism is my specialty.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was a Russian also, but he advocated freedom and liberty, which nobody can honestly say Stalin advocated. Having said that, I'd like to suggest a totally new thread for this conversation so that the original thread here can get back on topic.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was a cheap NWO whore. I do have a tendency to pounce on those who mindlessly repeat NWO lies about Russia,Stalin etc. GIM is a place for thinking people who deal in facts only (I hope it is). Learn to distinguish between facts and propaganda and your eyes will open to countless lies you`ve been fed in your life. Start from examining the big events of the 20th century such as WW2 and its participants.

Sorry for digressing again.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

I think it was probably one guy, and he was the same size, or smaller, and you nearly getting beat up by your dad was him taking you out for ice cream afterwards.

:signs14:

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

I think you're on to him.:wink:

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

lol...after reading the caption, I'd have to say that's one of the more hilarious ones I've seen.

Re: No Guns for Negroes
 

It is pretty funny.